Folks, this blog may make you want to throw bleach over your eyes. It’s that bad.
Jeffrey Pribble, a varsity football coach and teacher at Tracy High School, was arrested last week after police said his cell phone was found recording students in the boys’ locker room.
Pribble, who began coaching at Tracy High School in 2004 and became head coach in 2021, was arrested on campus Friday afternoon. According to the Tracy Police Department, students discovered the phone recording them while they were changing in the locker room. The students stopped the recording, deleted the footage, and turned the phone over to a staff member.
The police department said Pribble was arrested on a misdemeanor charge. It said it generally involves intentionally using a concealed camera, or in this case a cell phone camera, to secretly record an identifiable person who is fully or partially undressed in a private area where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Pribble was issued a citation at the time of his arrest but was not booked into San Joaquin County Jail. He was processed at the police station and released.
Ummm, so catch and release doesn’t just apply to fishing season. Okay. Folks this guy (teacher) literally had a phone camera recording boys changing. They got him on a misdemeanor, but I have a feeling a felony or Megans List is coming. Bro, why are you recording boys? As a troll, I would comment “stop being a Leo Naranjo,” the women at a high school or local gym are barely wearing clothes. Visit there, use your eyes.
This coach needs to go away for a long time. Do not let your eyes confuse you. He is a sick puppy dog. Folks, hiding a phone or any other recording device in a locker room is sick.
Maybe, what is sicker, is this coach had the ability to walk through said locker room as often as he wanted as a male. Gross.
The Troll
Editor’s Note:Back when I was in the military (1982), the female Lieutenant—in charge of our bootcamp barracks—used to frequently walk through when we were taking showers. Since she was the supervisor in charge of our drill sergeants, we had to permit her entry into the building at any time; night or day.
By now, you readers know I am a Libertarian who basically believes in a person’s right to do anything they want when they are an adult. I believe in personal freedom. So why do I hate gambling? Shouldn’t someone be able to gamble if they so choose? The answer is a “yes” and “no;” sure, in principle, a person of age adult is more than okay to gamble his paycheck on red or black.
The problem is that gambling has spread immensely and, in my opinion, is unregulated now. It used to be you had to make a pilgrimage to: Las Vegas, Tahoe or Reno; if you lived in California. In Nevada, it’s kind of an anything goes state; prostitution is legal, your drinks are comped free at casinos, and gambling is welcomed. I have no issue with this. My issue is, California and a lot of other states, have decided to legalize Indian Casinos to operate in them. Back then a couple popped up here and there, but now darn near every town in my area has one. To give you an idea, within a 1.5-hour drive from my house, I can go to Cache Creek, Thunder Valley, Hard Rock, Jackson Rancheria, Sky River (down the street from me); in addition to a couple of gambling halls in Sacramento. I’m sure I missed a few others, but you get the point. Oh, and they are building 2 more in the same area over the next few years. Even these casinos, while I see it as nothing more than a money grab for the city they are located in, don’t bother me too much.
What really bothers me is the roll-out of daily fantasy/sports gambling right on your phone. Yep, even actual gambling. The Supreme Court legalized it, and most states allow it. The problem is regulation and compliance laws do not exist. While drafting this blog post, I actually tested this theory and was stunned at how I was able to circumvent the laws in place. So, the actual gambling sites i.e. Fan Duel and the like are illegal in California. The Indian Casinos defeated that proposition. But I was able to download the app on my phone, use a fake name, address and viola, it worked. I used the name of a character in the movie Animal House and an address of 101 Main Street, yep it worked. Upload a copy of a government issued ID? Nope, not required. Verification of my identity? Nope. The rules for gambling sites are about as stringent as voter requirements in Blue states. I am free to place what amounts to illegal bets on this app platform. Now to be fair, I’m sure if I placed a couple large wagers and won, emphasis on won, they would flag my address and name for fraud. The key Is winning wagers.
The problem that this brings up is underage gambling.
Younger adults report even higher rates of early sports betting and online casino play before age 21 compared to older generations. The survey found that 33% of 21–44-year-olds placed a sports bet before 21, versus 11% of 55+.
“Youth are at significantly greater risk for developing gambling problems, and as gambling becomes increasingly normalized in media, sports, and online spaces, the risks grow,” said Heather L. Maurer, MA, CAE, Executive Director of NCPG. “Prevention and education are essential to ensure young people, families, educators, and policymakers understand the potential harms and are protected from early exposure.”
This is a real issue; there is no way to verify age via an app on your phone to see if you are of legal age to gamble. Just like a pornography site, check a box saying you are of legal age, and you are good to go. You would think with AI and other means, it would have caught me using a cell phone in central California, caught me using an obviously fake name, and using a fake address, but no. They likely operate under a business model that if I won a few bets, they would flag me and make me either pay back the winnings or sign some legal mumbo jumbo saying I will never bet with them again. If you are underage, I would assume you pay back the winnings and if you lost money they would make you whole. I say the latter is to keep the regulators at bay; you don’t want the government snooping around when it comes to underage gambling. But you can see it’s a problem.
In closing I will say this; it’s a bad vice. Comparing it to alcoholism, a large bottle of Jack Daniels can likely last you three days or more and costs around $30. Pro and college sports can be found daily, and even several games a day. While bets may start at $5 or so, it will add up quite quickly. I was stunned at all the things you can bet on in a game; not just which team will win. You can bet the over/under on the total points scored and bet on just about every player’s stats they will put up. Oh, and the latter bets carry much larger potential payouts, so as a result you bet more. Oh, and your phone app doesn’t know if you are of age, or in a state of intoxication, making it illegal for you to gamble. It should only be legal inside of a casino, but we have built so many alternate means of access that gambling is very much available to any and everyone.
I feel compelled to explain this to the older generation. Young people, millennials, generation Z, etc. are not socialists, communists, reds, or whackos… for the most part. I am going to explain why they have beliefs that you in the older generation call socialism or communism.
The biggest misunderstanding from generation to generation is life is always changing and evolving. I liken it to the game of football. For example, it used to be the forward pass didn’t/barely existed. Teams ran the ball exclusively; games scores were 12-9. Fast forward to today, the forward pass is a major part of the game and teams are routinely scoring 30 points plus per game! My point is just because something worked back in the day doesn’t mean it can’t evolve. A better example is the internet; I remember old AOL (America Online) when you had to essentially shut the phone line down to your house to surf the internet. Dial-up modem with blistering 56K connections. Oh, the memories. Now look, internet is widely available wirelessly and very inexpensive, relatively speaking.
I will try to explain the issues one by one, but I won’t bore you with an exhaustive list. Try to be open-minded here.
Tax the rich: This one is actually easy if you think about it. Most rich people actually pay little in taxes because they take their earnings in stock options, dividends, and capital gains. Those are taxed at a lower amount than regular income, substantially less. I am not calling them tax cheats, they are well within their rights to do this, but it’s viewed as an unfair loophole. This is where the “Warren Buffet’s secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does” argument originated from. Also, many wealthy own business(s) and create layers of LLCs to shield corporate tax as well. Again, I’m not calling anyone a tax cheat, just pointing this out. Lastly, Elon Musk passing a trillion dollars in net worth (in the form of stock options by the way) is another sticking point, who needs that kind of money?
Medicare for all: This one again is made possible by the older generations. Young people in general feel screwed because their corporations don’t offer healthcare either, or it’s so watered down that it’s basically a worthless plan. Try buying it on the healthcare exchange, options are very limited and expect to pay circa $500 a month for a trash plan. Many have opted out of healthcare period; that’s a very dangerous option.
Editor’s Note:Case in point, I have a health insurance plan (just for me) costing $840 per month. I have used it once so far this year. The doctor’s bill was $460. The insurance co-pay was $80 at the time of the appointment. The medical insurance paid $79 and then sent me a letter saying I need to pay the balance. It’s July. I have paid seven medical insurance payments of $840 ($5,880) and they paid $79. You bet I’m gonna cancel it early. Welcome to Obamacare in 2026.
Free groceries/services: Again, you scream socialism but with things so unaffordable right now the idea is striking a chord with younger people. Credit card accounts 90-days plus delinquent are at an all-time high. This means people are charging essentials and are hoping to pay them off with a Christmas bonus ala National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation. City bus should be free. Why do we have toll lanes/booths? It seems unfair to us who don’t have money and are starting out.
Student loan forgiveness: yeah, I know back in the day you paid your loan in full, it was a fraction of today’s tuition. The reality is that college turned into a 5-year plus experience due to classes not being offered in certain semesters. The administration building and administrator staffs have doubled in size and tuition did the same. Six-figure student loan debt is a real thing, and it’s a millstone around people’s necks.
Pay a living wage: This one is actually one I agree with the younger generation on. Corporations are all about profit and numbers, so as a result, they suppress wages. The gym I work out at (it’s a chain by the way) pays the MANAGER $22 an hour! Wages for other workers are $16.50. This gym shares a parking lot with a Burger King where wages by law start at $20 an hour. You are telling me a manager should be paid only $2 an hour more than a fast-food worker? Come on. Quit worrying about making an extra buck on earnings and pay your people.
There is no loyalty to corporations anymore: Yeah, I know you worked for one company your entire life. You worked your way up to management and got a 40-year plus plaque when you retired. Times are way different now. Let me answer this with a question. Why should I be loyal to you when you will lay-off workers if the quarterly numbers are no good, shut the factory/store down at any moment, suppress wages, and take benefits away at any time? This cuts both ways.
Why aren’t young people having kids: Easy one, look at the cost of daycare alone. Then add other expenses related to child-raising, its flat-out unaffordable.
(Editor’s Note:25 years ago, my wife was paying more than $1,200 per month for afterschool care for two children. That was for less than three hours a day. I’m sure that number now is at least double.)
Why does my daughter have an Only Fans: Well, it’s about wages/affordability. I do not condone the behavior on that site, but bottom line is, if you want to maintain a certain lifestyle, you have to look for extra money. Again, back to the living wage argument.
Rent control/freeze: Again, it’s about affordability. You raise my rent 10% a year, my wages are barely moving. You wonder why people are embracing van life and living in their cars? You priced them out of the rental market.
In closing, this is not an exhaustive list of issues and understand I agree with very few of them. We are in a vicious cycle, raising wages is great in theory yet it raises the prices of goods, and rent. It also gave birth to AI, and it is going to take probably 20% of the jobs in this country. You get a degree then you find yourself working at a job paying $25 an hour, it’s also a job you feel is beneath your qualifications. Your corporation doesn’t make its earnings numbers for the quarter, so layoffs and store closures are coming. Work harder and faster, they say; sure, and at year’s end you get no raise or bonus because, well, we have to meet the shareholder’s expectations.
Folks, the young people are not dumb, they know socialism doesn’t work, they just see Zuckerberg, Musk, and Bezos with multiple houses, yachts, private jets, and ability to do anything they want while we struggle to get by as a fairness issue. Just try to see it through a different lens. When you are going through life and you are having a hard time affording things then you look for an answer. You have a degree, you are living with a roommate, you are working a job that barely pays the bills. You look to the socialist types, and you think it’s a good idea. Socialists don’t have the solution but at least they acknowledge the problem exists.
The biggest point of this blog is I know boomer types, they are great at yelling for me to get off their lawn but the old ways of go to college, get a degree, work for one company your entire life, get married, buy a house, have a couple kids, is a faded memory that is unattainable because that world exists only in their faded memories. It’s not a thing anymore. It’s hasn’t been for a long time now.
Blogger Note:This is not about voter fraud it’s about the scary amount of fraud uncovered in the last few months.
It started with “learing” centers in Minneapolis, then hospice care facilities in Los Angeles, now I got a bombshell Fox News alert about Medicaid fraud in Ohio.
Folks, what we must quit doing is blaming one party or the other when it comes to fraud. Both sides do it; both sides may even be in on it together in certain parts of the country. You mean to tell me that a guy with a camera phone/video camera, some free time, and some video editing equipment can uncover a massive fraud in Minneapolis regarding learning centers (schools) but no one else could? Folks, the video and interviews are eye popping. Learning center being spelled wrong on the main entrance sign. Decrepit buildings and essentially vacant interiors. No records of student attendance but they were inspected by the state (allegedly) and were definitely being paid. There are tons of those centers, they exist in every state, and likely in each town, you may not realize it.
In Los Angeles, the story is the same but exchange learning centers for hospice clinics. While I forget the numbers, I thought I saw 248 or so clinics existed in Los Angeles (City of or county-wide I do not recall.) That is an ungodly number. These places must be registered and licensed, also inspected by inspectors. Many of these clinics existed in the literal same building. Again someone(s) were signing off on paperwork, obviously forging/approving licensing and inspections, and paying fraudulent billing invoices for services not rendered. Folks you need to be one sick human being to bill for the dead or dying, and likely for years; when you had zero customers.
Here are the Ohio claims…
Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy is calling for a sweeping crackdown on his state’s Medicaid program after a report alleged that companies billed millions of taxpayer dollars from vacant offices, including abandoned buildings with piled-up mail, “out to lunch” signs and no visible staff.
The remarks came after a report by The Daily Wire that allegedly found 288 home healthcare companies listed at the same addresses, including locations that appeared vacant or in disrepair, with no clear signs of active business operations.
While I don’t take his comments or even the article at anything for than face value, this is now state number 3, with more on the way. It’s a national problem. The bigger issue is the people who aid and abet this behavior by trying to play partisan politics.
Time Walz (Governor MN) and Ilhan Omar (Congressmember – Somalia) both came out swinging that there is/was nothing to see here. Blaming racism as most of these businesses were owned by Somalian people. In Los Angeles it was more of the same. We always, here in California, excuse this fraud by claiming it’s a witch hunt, nothing to see here. These baseless claims are obviously done by a far right political blogger wannabe. In Ohio, Mike Dewine, a Republican governor had this to say…
In a statement to Fox News, they insisted Ohio “has extensive oversight mechanisms in place,” noting that these include “Electronic Visit Verification for hourly care, requiring signed daily activity logs, conducting audits and surveys performing background checks on providers, and reassessing medical needs regularly…”
His office also pointed to “internal agency efforts to fight waste, fraud and abuse.”
That’s why these schemes are allowed to exist. They are excused by folks in power, and in some cases, I wonder if these folks are directly in on it. Can you say, Mrs. Newsom and diapers? Common sense will tell you that several clinics at the same literal building suite should raise a red flag. Decrepit, outdated, falling apart buildings as well, but sadly in this country we follow the old military rules of “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” We ask no questions, nor do we “trust but verify”. We not only allow these schemes to perpetuate for years, but actually we encourage it. Get your bill in, we will pay it faster. Jump through some hoops, we won’t even review it. To be fair and honest, most of the corporate structure for these groups are layers of shell companies and LLC’s that are nearly impossible to track down. PO Boxes and corporate legalese make them impossible to track. We should/need to put an end to this, but we won’t. These stories will blow over; nothing will happen and back to business as usual. Heck, we have an election to run.
Speaking of fraud, check this out.
Vice President J.D. Vance just dropped a political grenade: the US government basically ignores fraud under $1.5 million, but he’s promising a crackdown on the big fish.
“We do not prosecute fraud in this country if it’s under $1.5 million dollars per year,” Vance said in an interview with YouTuber Benny Johnson.
Blogger unsubstantiated commentary: I honestly think a lot of this fraud stems from Joe Biden/Kamala Harris open border for 4 years. Untold numbers of people poured across our southern border and through unchecked (to be clear I am not insinuating they are all criminals) and received aid from the government and assistance from government groups (think USAID and other NGOs). I think they got advice on how to get money from our government’s programs and spread out in every direction. Then when they found the hot bed areas for fraud, or government that will look the other way, all their fellow brethren moved in as well. Ever wonder why Dearborn, Michigan and Minneapolis, Minnesota are heavily populated by Muslims? Again, not insinuating all Muslims are bad, but the countries they are coming from are the total opposite climate. There is a reason this fraud is being reported in large numbers only in 3 cities; Minneapolis, Columbus and Los Angeles, the word is out in those cities no one asks questions.
Just my thoughts. As mentioned, two states are pretty leftward leaning, one is rightward leaning. It’s a bipartisan issue.
In case you are not aware, Diana Russini covered the NFL for The Athletic; a pay-to-view website. Mike Vrabel is the head coach of the New England Patriots and was head coach of the Tennessee Titans prior to that. Russini gets paid to cover the NFL and more specifically get scoops before anyone else does. She was by most accounts very good at her job. Another thing that followed Russini was the rumors of inappropriate sexual behavior that she was trading for said scoops. There was always smoke but never fire, well until now.
One piece of information I’d like to pass along. Always tell the truth, you will never remember the story you told or who you told it too.
The information above is what 90-day guy lacked. It cost him. He told five different stories to five different people. The mental gymnastics is causing him mental anguish. I witnessed him contradict himself 3 sperate times in the course of a 3 minute conversation. When called out, he would go to his old standby “I don’t have a good memory.” As Chief would say, “Folks, you know who doesn’t need a good memory? The guy who always tells the truth.”
Back to Vrabel and Russini.
Both are married, but not to each other. They were both photographed together at The Ambiante Hotel in Arizona. The Ambiante is known for being adults only. Also, it’s a romantic getaway where you usually are proposing to your girlfriend or you’ve made the decision you want to have a child in 9 months. I went to the Ambiante hotel with my, at the time, girlfriend. Folks, as mentioned above, we left the room to eat, and to lounge by the pool, but a lot of sex was happening.
Russini is definitely very good looking but likely doesn’t have much in the brain department.
The photos leaked out and Russini took a page out of the 90-day guy’s playbook. It backfired. I call it the Holy Trinity of Stupidity.
She first insulted everyone’s intelligence by saying it was a chance encounter with another friend. Umm … folks, I have multiple female friends; we do not embrace or interact like that. Also, not on a trip without our significant other/spouse. Then she said that she was there for a girl’s weekend trip. Then when out of lies, she decided to play the sympathy/victim card saying it was lies and she didn’t want to give the story any more oxygen. If you are a loser in life, this is the playbook you follow. Notice, she could have told the truth, and while consequences would have occurred, the story would blow over.
Again, she could have told the truth but didn’t want to risk her marriage so she claimed it was a chance encounter. Then it was a girl’s weekend getaway, (strangely this would be the first girl’s weekend in the history of girl’s weekends with zero photos taken of said girls.) Secondly, going to that particular hotel and calling it girl’s weekend was definitely an interesting choice of words. Just by going there, many would understand it as a girl-on-girl orgy type outing. Definitely a different spin on girls just wanna have fun. Again, bad move. The pulling the victim/sympathy card is the last play in the playbook. Yep, when all else fails, resort to the victim or sympathy card. She is not a victim.
Russini is now seeing her life come apart at the seams. She lost her job reporting and covering New England in the NFL. Bottom line, you cannot be having sex with your source and be non-biased. It’s an ethics issue. A big one. She will land another gig, but she is damaged goods. Her marriage is likely on the rocks. No guy wants to be viewed as your “Monday through Thursday guy” with your side piece taking over on date night/weekends. Oh, she has a son who is four named Mike. Coincidentally, she was photographed with Mike Vrabel 9 months prior to her son’s birth. I would say we have even money odds that the kid may not be his. Even if it is his kid, now you find out he is named after the man your wife cheated with? Ouch. Her friend group is likely eviscerated as well. When she brought up it was a girl’s getaway trip, I have a feeling her group chat was filed with “keep us out of your adultery.” Girls in your friend group are not dumb; they don’t want to be blamed for your marriage likely dissolving. As one of Chief’s friends of the blog said, girls do not want to wreck a home. In the case of Russini, she wrecked hers. It seems as if Mike Vrabel likely dropped 7 figures on a ring or other material things for his current bride and his marriage may be ok. Money can buy happiness, especially when happiness involves likely not working and being a stay-at-home wife.
One thing I saw, while buying a couple items at the grocery store, was a gossip magazine essentially asking why Vrabel has gotten a pass and asserting that double standard exists. Folks, there is no double standard. Having an affair with a women who is not your wife doesn’t mean you get fired as a football coach. Morally bankrupt? Yes. Unemployed? No. He, to his credit, has also stayed silent for the most part, Russini lied over and over. As mentioned earlier, Russini is paid for her ability to break news before it goes mainstream. When you are sleeping with your source, your ethics are compromised.
Back to the point of this blog. If you tell the truth, you have no reason to lie or fabricate a story. It also makes memory easy. You can always recall the truth. Trying to memorizing 5 different stories you told to 5 different people is mentally taxing and emotionally draining.
It was amazing for me to hear 90-day guy, in a 3-minute, one-sided conversation, tell me he couldn’t get ahold of his doctor, then he loved his doctor and said he was the best, then he wanted to be on a stronger pill, then he also wanted off said pill.
He has no issue throwing his brother or his other agent friend in front of the oncoming bus when needed. Oh, when he was called out about his changing story he claimed he is the face of dementia. Like I said earlier, Holy Trinity of Stupidity; insult someone’s intelligence by telling 2 completely different stories, throw other folks under the bus, then play a sympathy/victim card.
It’s why he has no friends and is alone. Ditto for Russini. No one likes the person who throws people innocently under the bus. You want to cheat? Leave your friends out of it. You may be morally bankrupt; they do not need to be involved.
For the 90-day guy, he watches too much TV to know he is a loser. He knows he is alone but doesn’t seem to know why. His version of reality is quite malleable. My explanation for that is easy as I have seen the tire marks on Chief’s back from being thrown under the bus too many times when 90-day guy has been caught manipulating reality and needs to blame someone else.
In the case of Diana Russini, it’s time for you to do some inner searching and reflection. I will say the quiet part out loud, it’s going to hurt. Diana you were just a hot little piece of ass for the football coach. Hence when this news broke, he pulled out all the stops to save his marriage. He may have loved “penetrating you’re A gap or being in your defensive backfield” (hat tip to Troll for that one) but do you really believe you’re the first that’s been his backup piece? Diana, one sentence of a tip for you; you are 43 and still smoking hot, you won’t be that way forever. Try to make right with your Shake Shack Executive husband. This too shall pass. People forgot the late Kobe Bryant cheated on his wife.
The point of this blog should not be forgotten, tell the truth because you will always remember it, you will never remember the lie you told or whom you told it too. When you lie, the problem is you must tell another lie to cover that up, then another one, and so on. If you are the 90-day guy or Diana Russini, you likely have an IQ in the mid-single digits, gentle reminder: there are a lot of people smarter than you, they can quickly figure out 1+1 wasn’t equaling 2. Don’t lie. The benefit of not lying is that you don’t need a good memory when you always tell the truth.
Warning: this post discusses adult themes and is not for the faint of heart or those under 18 years old.
So, I was in the office working today for 90-day guy’s colleague. 90-day guy retired last month but has been coming by to clean-up his personal belongings. He has a computer that is his that he left behind. He quarried me today about what he should do to remove the data from it. I answered that with a question “why are you so concerned with what is on the hard drive?” He quickly retorted he had nothing to hide; he was just curious. I told him either; throw it away in the dumpster or take it to e-waste to be recycled. He wanted no part of either of those as he is convinced someone would obtain said computer and hijack his info. With as much TV as he watches, I would assume he saw reports on the news and likely watched a program about dumpster diving leading to identity theft or something. Odd paranoia for someone who has nothing to hide, am I right?
Computer in need of e-waste or decontamination
Maybe I am naïve, but who would want to obtain your computer and crack the hard drive? Let’s be honest just for a minute, if you are storing your username and passwords on your computer in a Word file, you may be the dumbest person on earth. But even if someone obtained that info, most people have two-factor authentication set up, like I do. You could steal my information, but you would also need my phone to get into any account of mine, as a 6-digit code is sent to my text message box.
He doesn’t have passwords or sensitive info on his computer. It’s pornography, and very disturbing pornography to boot.
How do I know this? Well, it’s speculation because I have not seen it, but let’s just say there is a ton of smoke. Here I’ll explain.
Here are some of the leading indicators:
Sick, very inappropriate sexual jokes. On two separate occasions, he demanded me and my now employer listen to his “very, very funny joke” of a man having sex with a sheep. On the other occasion it was a man having sex with a goat. I will not gross you out by repeating said “jokes.” On both occasions of telling these, he laughed like a four-year-old would laugh at the word “poop”. Neither my current employer nor I laughed at all. 90-day guy said, “what is wrong with you two? It’s funny!” I felt compelled to respond saying “people do not have sex with animals, its gross, disgusting, and a wildly inappropriate topic for a work setting. He didn’t agree.
Normalizing transgender behavior. He has a granddaughter who is dating a transgendered male. He has always wildly defended transgendered people, and I never really knew why. He has suddenly become the “Colin Kaepernick” of defending transgendered people. Calling them “oppressed”, or in need of “being equal to others.”
Odd comments/behaviors about younger girls. So, on this one I caught him. I had to go behind his desk to grab a rate book manual, and on his phone, he was looking at young girls in swimsuits. While this isn’t really a crime per se, it’s pretty gross. He made the comment “when you get older, you need to look at half naked or naked young girls to get it up.” Yikes.
Comments about his granddaughter. This is gross. He made a comment about his freshman in high school granddaughter calling her “hot.” Barf.
Jokes about same sex “sex.” As Jake the Snake will tell you, the Catholic Church screwed up with the priests having sex with young boy’s scandal. Full stop. 90-day guy routinely makes comments about the Catholic priests and the Boy Scout leaders having sex with young boys; like way more often than a normal person would. Seems like an obsession with him. His latest comment was “if two guys are having sex is it considered doggy style?” Yikes.
Odd relationship with his brother. This one is wild. He has nothing good to say about his brother, quite literally nothing. He will golf/hangout with him and afterwards have nothing good to say again. They go out to lunch, again he says zero good to say about him. However, when his brother texts/calls him, he not only answers, he feels compelled to hang out/golf/go to lunch etc. Who does that? When I finally met his brother, I asked him what it was like growing up with 90-day guy. Well, before his brother could get a word in, 90-day guy filibustered, talking about … well … nothing. It was talking just to fill time and not allow anyone else to speak. After he was done with his filibuster, they immediately “had to leave.” More on this later.
So how can I conclude he has porn on his computer?
So, first, I am not a fan of circumstantial evidence, I like seeing a smoking gun, not “if this, then that must be true”. However, in this case, there is too much smoke for there not to be fire.
But porn isn’t illegal!
This is in fact correct. Porn, in my opinion, is likely 70% of the traffic on the internet. Yes, it is not illegal to possess or look at porn. Even the very disturbing men with animals, transgender porn, or even same sex porn. But (btw no good thing ever comes after the word “but”) pornography with people underage is a felony and a major crime at that.
My conclusion.
He is a very sick puppy dog. Very sick. No one of sound mind declares they “have nothing to hide” while simultaneously not wanting their computer to fall into the wrong hands. For the living impaired, if you throw your computer or anything into the trash for that matter, the garbage truck has a ram that will repeatedly smash said garbage over and over again. I have seen said garbage truck empty its load at the dump, with the load being unrecognizable. If someone was going to grab a computer (if they can find one), then in my opinion, go for it. Access it and steal anything you want. News flash: no one is going to do that.
I am positive that he has a treasure trove of very eclectic porn on his computer’s hard drive. The jokes about men having sex with animals is because he is trying to attempt to normalize his obsession. His comments about transgender people being people too is because he is into that as well. When you are into the porn like he is, you have to normalize it. Why? Because nothing is normal at all about a guy having sex with animals, nor a guy deciding he is a girl. The photos of girls in swimsuits, also is not a crime, it gives dirty old man vibes. The porn is not an issue; the problem is as follows.
The porn on his computer is that of underage girls. His comments crystallize it. His paranoia seals it. Folks no one cares what kind of porn you are into, it’s sick but if the actors are over 18, it’s not a crime. Gross, but again, not a crime. However, the porn with underage girls carries something that should scare most people to death. There is no statute of limitations on that.
Ask Subway spokesperson Jared Fogel what happens when they find underage porn on your computer.
The reason for my conclusion
Well, it’s obvious. Folks who have nothing to actually hide do not care if you look at things. William moved my hard drive’s contents from one computer to another. If any out of sorts things existed, he would have found it. Oh, wait, he, like most, doesn’t give a you know what!
And, as a guest blogger, we will turn this over to Jake the Snake for further commentary:
So, I went to a lecture about addiction. It focused on all addictions. I failed the bar exam so that was part of it, it was not court ordered by the way. When the speaker spoke about porn, it was eye opening. First, you watch guy/girl porn, then maybe girl/girl or I guess guy/guy porn. The point being, the guy/girl doesn’t do it for you anymore. So, you need to go for more hardcore. I think that is where the transgender porn come in, because “regular porn” doesn’t cut it. Then the underage porn come into play, because of course, the other porn doesn’t cut it anymore. The animal porn well… see above. As you desensitize yourself, you are having to reach further for something to get you off. Barf.
Commentary by The Chief Continues
Folks, this is going to hurt, but it’s likely the truth. I made a comment about 90-day guy and his brother. The vibe that I get from their relationship is that he was sexually assaulted by his brother at a young age. Yep, go ahead and say I’m crazy, but he was very uncomfortable when his brother was around. He wanted to spend zero time even acknowledging his childhood existence. He apparently hates him, unless he is in the room. The act is obvious. He has been on the business end of a dick. He tries to justify transgender behavior which is normal for those who like same sex porn. His comments about very young girls are nothing but a chance to stay relevant.
Folks, if I saw a babe wearing a thong swimsuit at my gym, I admit I’d be looking. Clearly, she wants me to. Chief is 40, not dead! But under aged children NFW.
90-day guy fantasizing about seeking out young girls when he is older, gross. Hoping such a girl might really want to be with some dirty old man like him, twisted. Feeding said perversions from the internet while at work and simultaneously claiming he is a happily married man, simply beyond my vocabulary to describe.
I hope he figures out what to do with his computer, but man, be true to yourself.
Kristin Cabot, the girl on Kiss Cam at the Coldplay concert caught with her “boyfriend,” went on Oprah Winfrey’s show to try to explain away what she did. Boy it was a doozy. She somehow came out smelling worse, not better. Let’s take a deep dive, and then have Troll destroy her. (Fear not Cabot you already destroyed one marriage at least!).
Kristin Cabot, the HR executive caught in a clandestine kiss with her boss at a Coldplay concert last summer, is opening up about a shocking angle to the story that still has netizens captivated.
“I was walking into the concert and my daughter messaged me and said, ‘Oh it’s so great that you and Andrew are both at Coldplay,’” Cabot told Oprah Winfrey in a clip that premiered on PEOPLE ahead of tomorrow’s new episode of The Oprah Podcast.
Andrew is Cabot’s estranged husband, Andrew Cabot, the CEO of a rum distillery. Cabot didn’t attend the July 16 Coldplay show at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Mass., with Andrew, but Andy — that is, Andy Byron, her married boss whom she was seen snuggling on the kiss cam.
Caught in a clandestine kiss huh? So, your boyfriend or I guess friend who happens to be your supervisor, that you directly report to at work, has his hands on both your breasts (aka the hand bra). Cabot for her part didn’t look like someone who wasn’t enjoying it, as her hands were on top of his. Obviously, this wasn’t the first time he has done this. Well, the stadium “kiss cam” showed both of them and they reacted like a couple of folks cheating on their partners, they immediately scurried out of view and looked embarrassed.
Coldplay lead singer Chris Martin immediately called out the moment as it happened live. “Oh, look at these two,” he announced to the packed arena. “Either they’re having an affair or they’re just very shy.” The video originally shared by a concert attendee to TikTok quickly racked up millions of views.
Very obvious she was having an affair with him, no other way to put it. Folks on a date don’t behave like that. She got caught.
Both Cabot and Byron ultimately left their posts as CEO and chief people officer at Astronomer, a data engineering company. Cabot later claimed that Byron was in the middle of his own separation from wife Megan, but the couple has since been photographed together wearing their wedding rings.
“I made a bad decision and had a couple of High Noons and danced and acted inappropriately with my boss,” Cabot said when she finally broke her silence about the incident in December. Regarding the “500 to 600 calls a day,” doxxing, and death threats that followed, Cabot reflected, “I want my kids to know that you can make mistakes, and you can really screw up. But you don’t have to be threatened to be killed for them.”
Stop the gaslighting lady! You were out looking to have fun and got caught. I am not sure how you felt having a luxury box and literally, essentially, having dry sex was smart. Saying its inappropriate behavior is just a weird thing to say. It wasn’t inappropriate, its gross. Let’s be honest, that type of behavior is just not socially acceptable. As far as your having a few beers, who cares? It’s the subsequent behavior that was gross. You were both consenting adults until it went on the video board. The comment about being doxed is funny. You acted out, went viral, and now you want the attention to stop? That’s rich. I highly doubt you got death threats, but if you did, why not report it to the authorities? As far as the 500-600 calls a day, that is farfetched. Yes, Ms. Cabot, people make mistakes, the problem is the way you got caught. However, the unforgiving part is you cheated with a still married man. The fact that he was still wearing a wedding ring makes you look like a homewrecker. Very few people like people like that, and those who do tend to be immature.
Commentary
Sorry babe. I do not buy your story at all. You all weren’t out on a date, it was a drunken hook-up with your boss. You are not just friends. It’s funny how you describe your relationship as not sexual in nature. A picture is worth a thousand words, and my goodness! You letting someone grab your tits in public is a rough look. It wasn’t until the Kiss-Cam caught you that you found your morals. You do not get the presumption of privacy when out in public. The video from that night told the nation you were cheating on your spouses. Your night was going great until you got caught. As far as it not being a sexual relationship, sure, if that makes you feel better. It’s obvious you both are having sex, but hey, keep saying you aren’t and maybe it makes sense in your head.
The bigger question you should ask yourself is: how did you get on Kiss Cam to begin with. I highly doubt it’s random. I saw a report but cannot find it, that you and a bunch of your girlfriends were in attendance that night. While I cannot locate that article, I have a feeling a couple people in your friend group may not approve of your behavior toward a married man! Your behavior that night was likely not the first time you have poured on the PDA (public display of affection) in front of your friend group. Your friends likely went to guest services, or customer service and basically said can we get our friends on Kiss Cam. Foxborough Stadium holds about 55K; I would assume due to it being where an NFL team plays. There is no chance it was a coincidence that you both got caught. The Kiss Cam operator waited for just the right moment, and boom, ya’ll got outed. His reaction and yours were one of “oh sh*t” and you both scurried off screen. Your friends got you outed.
How can I say that with so much certainty? Did I cheat on someone once? Nope.
The lawyer from Law Firm Low, Ballem and Lynch once told me a story.
She said girls are a very interesting species. Most do not support cheating on a partner, but some girls do. Even if they are the one who is cheating, no girl wants to wreck a home or relationship. Especially if they think the guy is cheating on someone who doesn’t know. She said no girl will confront the other girl; they do it in a very subtle way to get her attention. She told me they will usually leave a hair tie under the bed, some make up/lipstick in her (the other girls) medicine chest or under the sink. The other move is to leave a pair of her underwear in the dirty clothes basket. Girls are very self-aware of the colors and type of underwear they wear. Try to explain away a pair that isn’t hers being in the laundry basket. That won’t go well. It’s subtle things like that, that expose the cheater. Like she stated, pretty hard to explain away another girl’s hair tie, underwear, or make up being in the house.
Bottom line, Ms. Cabot, you cheated and you got what you deserve.
The Troll
PS I am not sure why you keep doing interviews about this. You had 15 minutes of fame, and it will be gone from people’s memories just as quick, but instead, you keep the story in the limelight. Odd behavior.
Before you get your hopes up, this blog isn’t about Lauren Boebert “dumping them out” or Nancy Mace having sex with her husband prior to a prayer service. My apologies for the click bait title.
This is about one thing in politics that really drives me nuts.
“A politician’s number 1 job is to get re-elected.” – William circa 10 years ago or so.
This could not be more true. Actually, the arrogance of these types is a sight to behold. Here are examples of this behavior from both parties.
Tom McClintock (R-All over CA)
He was a state senator in Ventura, then moved to Rocklin area to run for congress. For those of you not aware these cities are nowhere near each other and have nothing in common except that they are safe GOP seats. He then relocated again after the last redistricting to the Yosemite area, again, several hundred miles away. He only cares about himself.
Kevin Kiley (R-CA)
His seat was obliterated with the “Gavinmander” as I call it. So, he dropped his Republican affiliation and is running in a more even district. He would lose anyway, but running as Independent gets you obliterated, like badly. Like he will get 8% of the vote in the primary and finish poorly.
Doris Matsui (D-Sacramento)
Doris is in a tough primary against a young progressive Democrat. Matsui who was “gifted” her seat by her husband dying has been a do nothing stooge for her entire career. She is incensed she has competition. Like most, it is her seat until she decides it isn’t. Oh, she claims a home in Maryland as her primary residence for tax purposes. Word has it that she wants her son to succeed her as it is the family’s hereditary congressional seat.
Dan Lungren (Former R-Sacramento area)
I personally watched Lungren have a meltdown when he was in a tough re-election race. He could not believe anyone could vote for someone who wasn’t him. Keep in mind he did little for the district and voted for the very unpopular bank bailout. Lungren lost four years later, and I was told he had a meltdown that night claiming that it was his campaign manager’s fault. I am of the opinion that he voted for the bailout “because the polls said it was a good thing.”
Anne Marie Schubert (Former DA Sac County)
I remember the local CRA and Republican Central Committee fawning over her. They hung on her every word; she was so Republican that no criminal would ever get out of jail. To me she always seemed like an opportunist. Well, after her last re-election as DA, before the ink dried on the results, she dropped the GOP label and became Independent. She ran as Attorney General, as she was the smartest person in the room. She got demolished. Shame on you losers who endorsed her. She used you and when you were no longer needed, she bailed.
Nathan Fletcher (Former Assemblyman)
Fletcher was elected as a Republican, I believe he served two terms. At his hospitality room for the convention, he made a speech saying he was a former military guy, and he would never forget who he was and his word was his bond. Oh, after his second re-election and millions being spent on his behalf, he became a Democrat. Yep, I would love to have served with him and been in the same foxhole. Based on his character, I picture him as taking enemy fire and while everyone is focused on fighting back, Fletcher is looking to exit stage right or toss a grenade at a bag of rice so he can get a Purple Heart like John Kerry.
Lauren Boebert (R-opportunist)
Boebert is hot, don’t get me wrong. Additionally, giving an over the pants hand job and letting your date grope you during a movie tells me she would be a fun time on a date. But on a more serious note, she moved from one end of Colorado to the other into a “safer” district because polling showed she may not get re-elected where she was better known.
John Cornyn (R-Texas)
Cornyn may be the worst example. He is a dyed-in-the-wool Liberal Republican. A go along to get along type. He is in a tough primary with Ken Paxton the Texas Attorney General. Trump wants the SAVE act passed, Paxton said he would drop out if Cornyn would vote to kill the filibuster and pas it. Viola! Cornyn suddenly is for it. I doubt it will save him, but this goes to show just how far some will go to get re-elected.
Michelle and Chris Orrock (Who knows)
Michelle was elected to the local parks and rec board in Elk Grove. Her husband, Chris, saw this as the jumping board to higher office (the State Capital) and as such, no other Republican could run even when the top 3 vote getters all won seats on the Board. Read that again, literal loser Chris Orrock wanted his wife to be the only Republican to win out of the 3. Oh, the local CRA President had no issue with this either. Strange how these so-called Republicans work right? Well, she was a liberal Republican at best, actually she is more like a watered-down Democrat. Alas, she lost her seat a while ago and hasn’t been heard from since. I would assume they are scouting for the next place to move to get her to the capital, probably in another state.
The person who sometimes proofreads my blog asked a valid question, what about certain members who move just slightly to run in a seat after re-districting? Fair, and I have no real issue with it. In the blog’s satellite office in Sacramento County, the lines have shifted a few times, moving to stay in your current district I’m fine with. Moving a county or two over, I am not.
Politicians the “Evolve”
Another type of politicians behaving badly are the ones who claim they have “evolved” on an issue. The Iraq and Afghanistan wars being the best examples. For it, against it, for the surge, then against it, for it, then in favor of pulling out, then mad about the pull out. Sounds like another war going on, am I right?
Conclusion
These folks do not care about you or your lifestyle, they want power. With that power comes access to information, information they can use to become quite wealthy. The phrase, you can tell a politician is lying when his lips are moving, is a good one, and is true, but the real reason is the information they get. Check out how many poor, or middle class, come to Congress, and leave millionaires several times over on a salary of about $180,000 a year. Oh, and having to live in 2 states to boot. Hence, they get so angry when there is a chance they might lose. Sell outs, all of them. These examples are just the worst I could think of during my lunch hour. I’m sure there are more that deserve to be added to my list.
Yep. In the words of broadcaster, Rush Limbaugh, Jesse Jackson has assumed room temperature. Jackson who catapulted his association with Martin Luther King into a life’s work, has died.
Jesse Jackson and others at assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.
Jesse was a false prophet of the social gospel that enslaves millions of black Americans. As long as he could deliver the votes every four years, he had a seat when Democrats—the Party of the KKK and Jim Crow—caucused.
Jesse was not a Christian. He preached, another, Jesus, another salvation, and a false gospel.
“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.”
Galatians 1:8.
Jackson was a man who spoke falsely.
“Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.”
Acts 20:30
He deceived the masses and was rewarded handsomely for it.
“For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.”
Romans 16:18
He preached a false Jesus, a false gospel, a lying spirit, and led many astray who had their itching ears tickled.
“For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.”
2 Corinthians 11:4.
Jesse Jackson ran for president too.
Jackson was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He and his fellow Justice Brother, Al Sharpton, made it their life’s mission to capitalized on misery and did their best to keep black people in subjugation to their plantation masters of the Democrat Party. They made it their mission in life to promote abortion of blacks, dependance on government programs, and the false gospel of socialism. They did all this evil wearing the collar of a servant of Christ. They led zero people into heaven and legions into hell in this life and the next.
Ray Stevens did a song many years ago asking, if Jesus would wear a Rolex on his television show? Jesse surely would and did.
He lived the “high life” while exploiting the poor. He got caught many years ago having fathered a child out of wedlock. Did he repent? Nope. He was sorry he got caught, not that he had his zipper down.
Yes, I’m picking on him. He deserves it. Sadly, he is just one of many from the so-called Baby Boomer generation that F*ed-up this country.
Folks, this country is the dumpster fire that it is because of the Baby Boomers. Nothing will get fixed until they are in the grave and the policies that they enacted are in the ash heap of history. FDR put us on the road to socialism but the Boomers of the 1960’s and 70’s brought the policies of FDR into fruition. The Democrat Party of JFK died in 1972 when Hayden, Fonda, et al took over.
There are and were good people in the Boomer generation, but they were out maneuvered and out matched by the godless humanists and atheists of their generation. They were the most selfish and destructive group of humans in the history of this nation, possibly any nation. Boomers have squandered the blessings of previous generations. Their legacy is one of debt, servitude, and destruction. They purposely left the next generation worse off than they were. The sad part is that they don’t care. Their whole world is based on selfishness without consequences.
Jackson and the Boomers exemplify the biblical axiom that “the compassion of the wicked is cruelty” and the other biblical description of evil men, “eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we die.” On these two pillars are the Boomer’s actions explained.
For the first time in his existence, Jesse Jackson believes in the God of the Bible, but it’s too late for his soul.
So, I came across this opinion article that quoted the Joe Rogan Program about the “Left’s response to the Charlie Kirk Murder.”
“The fact that they were cheering when he died, normal people — housewives, moms, f–king people working at banks, in various industries, celebrating a man getting shot in front of his kids, in front of the whole world. What the f–k is wrong with us?”
Those remarks came during his discussion this week with The Red Clay Straws, a country band. Rogan went on to clarify that he was talking specifically about the left’s response. “People on the Left, they’re supposed to be ‘progressive.’ These are supposed to be the kind, compassionate inclusive people that are celebrating gun violence, like public execution — that’s insane.”
Don’t get me wrong, Rogan is not wrong about that take in the slightest. There were many a person on the Left in all careers of life cheering or applauding the death of Charlie Kirk. However, there are many on the Right who would have a similar reaction if it was a Left leaning person or Democrat killed as well. Don’t even attempt to argue that point with me. I watched Jorge Riley spew absolute hateful BS at CRA and Sac County GOP meetings unchallenged. I received an email from Tony Andrade (rip) after Barack Obama got elected showing a watermelon garden and Kool-Aid in front of the White House. Again, unchallenged by the so called Right. A former CRA member about my age called for the firebombing of Planned Parenthood. A colleague of mine had an ear-to-ear grin when I asked “what if it were AOC instead of Charlie Kirk?” Trust me, the whack jobs are on both sides.
What the F**k is wrong with us is not the wrong take, it’s the correct one. But it applies to both sides.
To attack the Democrats, use this logic on them. They viewed Kirk as a Hitler, check out who they mourned….
Rogan speaks for a great many people who are just plain gobsmacked by the left’s capacity to excuse violence, which was evident this week after the death of Assata Shakur, a well-known leftist radical and convicted cop killer whose poetry was praised by those mourning her passing. Kirk, on the other hand, is not being remembered fondly by the left, which is of course their right—but when you have kinder things to say about an actual killer than you do about someone who merely used provocative language, it communicates something about your priorities.
Yikes. But again, check out similar martyrs; George Floyd, Michael Brown, and Daniel Abrego Garcia. That’s who you are going with?
Folks before you say Rogan is far right, he actually is fairly middle of the road, just like Bill Maher is not far left, he is an old school liberal.
The mainstream is starting to take notice of both sides veering further away from “the middle.” For example, there is a growing belief Israel is going too far and the US is allowing them to bring instability to the Middle East. Another is the rise of drug abuse, homelessness, and crime in our large cities making them uninhabitable. How about college campuses being allowed to have anti-Israel protestors take over entire lecture halls? All while the “leadership looks the other way or joins them.” How about allowing BLM/Antifa to take over a couple city blocks in Seattle or “Chaz/Chop” and allowing them to burn down businesses in the name of “outrage or feelings.” How about BLM rioters destroying city blocks because again feelings.
I am intrigued by what the future holds politically for both parties. While some will point to AOC or Gavin Newsom being the future of the Left, or DeSantis or JD Vance being the future on the Right, what about a person like Sen John Fetterman, a Democrat who supports Israel? Or Sen Rand Paul of Kentucky who is more of an old school conservative/libertarian type? It’s odd to think about because the way we are going politically seems to be inching further and further apart as opposed to closer to the center in terms of positive change.
The Chief
PS at my High School (Jesuit High) we had a speaker about a year after 9/11 address the student body, he called President George W Bush a war criminal, and in the same sentence called Saddam Hussein a humanitarian. In college in Marin County, the department chair for the Business School, upon seeing my Bush/Cheney 04 shirt said she wanted me “sent to Iraq and have my head blown off.” The incident, caught on video, was sent to the Dean of the business school, he claimed it was a violation of school policy for recording her without her permission. So, we sent it to the President of the University. He claimed it was freedom of speech. Folks, in both cases, they were wrong. The setting was public so the idea of being illegally recorded with an open camera doesn’t apply. Second, the First Amendment does not cover hate speech. This crap has been allowed at college campus’ forever. I will say it was nice seeing a sea change. Too bad it took the murder of Charlie Kirk for this to happen. But I too share the views of Joe Rogan. What the F**k is wrong with people.
