Matthew 24: Gary DeMar vs Kenneth Gentry, et al.
Kenneth Gentry, and some others that he uses as proxies, have been attacking Gary DeMar publicly (much of it on Facebook) since 2023 about the three questions controversy. Gentry and others have been alleging that DeMar is a closet full preterist. (More on full Preterism later.) In their minds, that makes DeMar a heretic and thus guilty of unorthodox eschatology.

In response, DeMar has simply pitted one supporter of the three questions against another to show that none of them agree with each other, so why should he respond directly. As a debate tactic, this is brilliant.

Furthermore, the original three questions lacked any citation of Scriptures to defend their claims. The originators of the three-question letter controversy base the whole thing on church tradition and not Scripture. This is why they are divided on their understandings. It is this hole in their logic that I would like to comment upon.
As DeMar likes to point out, when it comes to the historic Creeds of Christendom, nobody decided to “show their homework.” The Creeds make claims about the Christian faith but never cite any verses as proof texts; neither do they have any minutes of the meetings to explain the logic of why statements were included. In short, all that is preserved for us are the conclusions and not anything to back them up.
For the purposes of this blog, I am limiting discussion to the Nicene Creed. FYI the Nicene Creed was drafted in 325 AD and updated slightly into its final form in 381 AD.
I believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible.
I believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages.
God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father; through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven, and by the Holy Spirit was incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, he suffered death and was buried, and rose again on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures.
He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and his kingdom will have no end.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son,* who with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets.
I believe in one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. I confess one Baptism for the forgiveness of sins and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come.
Two comments on the above version. First, this is from a Roman Catholic website and a word or two might be different in another English translation. Second, in the paragraph on the Holy Spirit, “who proceeds from the Father and the Son” is the difference between Eastern and Western Christianity. Yep, “and the Son” highlights the difference in the understanding of the Trinity between Churches; although there is much history behind this division.
Preterism
Preterism, in its simplest form is believing that some parts of the Bible are in the past. If you believe Jesus is the prophesized Messiah and fulfilled related Old Testament prophecies, then you are a preterist. If you believe that some prophecies were fulfilled in the destruction of the Second Temple and Jerusalem in 70 AD, but others are still future to us then you are a partial preterist. If you believe everything in the Bible including the last few chapters of Revelation are fulfilled in some way, then you are a full preterist.
Sadly, the difference between full and partial Preterism is really more nuanced than what I just stated. There are people that are in between full and partial preterists. Some folks believe that some things began in the past, continue to be true today, and will not know complete fulfillment until sometime in the future.
The two sections of the Creed getting the most attention in the controversy are these:
He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and his kingdom will have no end.
and I look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come.
I could dissect these parts in much detail but not too many folks would care so I’ll try to keep this simple.
The type of questions being asked are like this:
- Where are these statements found in the Bible (Proof texts)?
- How did the original audience understand these statements?
- Were the statements based on Scripture, future or past when written into the Creed in 325 AD?
- When is or will be the resurrection of the dead?
- When is or will the Kingdom begin?
- What and when is the world to come?
- If Jesus is on the Throne now, what is he doing or waiting for?
- When is the resurrection of the dead?
Again, we have to reverse engineer the Creed to figure out such questions.
Folks, this sounds simple at first blush but once you start looking at this, it is evident that you are treading into deep theological waters trying to fully grasp the concepts tossed out by the writers of the Creed.
The Creed speaks of a future coming of Jesus, presumably at the end of the world but where is that in the Bible? Most of the coming passages are understood by the signers of the three questions letter as coming in judgment in the First Century, but “The Church” has historically believed in a final and consummating coming at the end of history.
This leaves a theological mess. Were the coming passages fulfilled (full Preterism)? Mostly fulfilled (partial Preterism)? Mostly in the future (Premillennial)? Requiring double fulfillment? Or something else?
Here’s an example from Paul to illustrate the complexity of the issue. He writes that to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. This verse is often quoted to give comfort to grieving families. It was quoted at my wife’s funeral. But how do you get to be “present with the Lord” without being judged in some fashion so God permits you to enter his presence? This implies that judgment is not at the end of the world but upon death. So, if you are judged at death then why not also be given your resurrected body at the same time? We spend eternity in bodies not as spirits floating around on clouds playing harps.
Gentry and his friends presuppose that the Creeds and Church tradition are correct about much of this being future and then interpret the Bible with these presuppositions trying to discern which bucket that a particular verse belongs in. If you agree with him then he calls you “orthodox” and if you disagree—especially about the timing—then I guess you get a letter calling you “un-orthodox.”
Matthew 24
Generally, Matthew chapters 23-25 are all one dialogue by Jesus frequently called the Olivet Discourse. Chapters 24 & 25 are said in response to questions asked of Jesus by his disciples. Some folks like DeMar believe that chapters 24 and 25 are a single unit speaking of the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem in 70 AD. Others split chapter 24—some like Gentry at very odd points—into part being fulfilled in 70 AD and part of the prophecy being future.
J. Marcellus Kik and many others split Matthew 24 between about verse 34 to 36 so that the first part of the chapter is about 70 AD and the rest is the traditional Second Coming.
Kenneth Gentry does this too, plus he pulls Matthew 24: 27 as a stand-alone verse concerning the Second Coming even though it comes in the midst of the part which most think applies to AD 70.
“For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
I don’t want to get into the weeds about this except to say that Gentry didn’t always hold this position but has adopted it in more recent times. It makes no sense, but he is hell-bent in accommodating the Creed into his post millennial position. He needs verses to support both AD 70 and the traditional Second Coming. Gentry is a lone gunman on verse 27 but holds this unique position.
If you look at the Olivet discourse, what many such as Kik try to do is book end the statements about “this generation” to fit an AD 70 application (Matthew 23:36 to Matthew 24:34) and then futurize the rest of chapter 24. Gentry randomly cherry picks verse 24:27 that he is compelled to futurize in the midst of the “this generation” passage.
Gentry is obliged to shoehorn verses into the future because of the Creed and Church tradition; not the context.
Were Matthew the only account of what shall be the signs of the end and coming of Jesus, then maybe Kik could have a point, but this bifurcation of Matthew is destroyed by looking at the same account in the other synaptic Gospels.
Conflicting Versions
Once you compare Matthew 24 & 25 with the parallel accounts in Luke 21 and Mark 13, then the structure forced onto the account in Matthew collapses. It is clear that all three accounts in their entirety are about the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD. It was a local judgment that could literally be escaped on foot by fleeing to the mountains. As proof that this was so, there are zero historical records of a single Christian being killed in the siege of Jerusalem. Secondly, Christians knew it would happen all the way back to the beginning chapters of Acts. Why was the Church in Jerusalem the only place where property was sold and the proceeds held in common by and for the Church? It was not socialism in the Bible; it was a testimony that the city would be lost within a generation as Jesus prophesized.
The problem that Gentry and other signatories of the three-question letter have is that there is not a single verse in the Bible that all parties signing the three questions letter agree apply to the end of the world. At least some of the signers believe verses should be applied to the AD 70 judgment.
On the one hand they want the traditional view that Jesus returns at the end of everything and at the same time they know that most verses apply better to an AD 70 fulfillment.
Folks the truth is that Jesus doesn’t really tell us how it all ends. Neither does he tell us what heaven will be like. In the end, we will have a body like his. We will not marry nor be given in marriage. We will have jobs of some sort and worship God. There is no more death or sin. Anything beyond this is speculation.
Between now and then, the Gospel will spread across the world. Most people will be believers at some point in the future. So many folks will be saved that when it is all over, it can truly be said that Jesus is the savior of the world. The end, whatever form or time it happens, is thousands of years from now. You are still living in the early church so buckle up and get to work.
Mike Lindell Gets Back on his Bull Sh*t
Mike Lindell is better known as the “My Pillow Guy” CEO. He was a very successful businessman. Sadly, in his later years of his life, Lindell has turned into a conspiracy theorist. He was one of the ring leaders of Donald Trump’s “the election was rigged” in 2020. Full stop, I believe there were shenanigans that night, but let us be honest, there is/was no proof. You cannot prove something with no proof. I’m going to need a little more than “I think” or “I’m pretty sure”.
He was Trump’s main advisor on trying to overturn the election result in 2020; again without proof.
Well, he ran for governor of Minnesota this year. Just a sidebar comment, Minnesota has the weirdest folks who have been governor, Jesse Ventura being one, Tim Walz is another odd duck. Lindell lost in the primary to the State Senator Lisa Demuth by 11%. He has raised questions about the legitimacy of the outcome and denied the results. He has not conceded. It was a Republican primary, not the general election.
Folks this is straight up election denial and a bad look. He is claiming the GOP primary was rigged? Come on. 11% is outside the margin of fraud and of lawyers. He lost fair and square; he comes off looking like a whacko. Yes, I am sure losing an election probably leaves some bruises and bumps on your ego but come on.
Folks, I have flipped on voter fraud; however, I believe for the most part, our elections are clean. Sure, Spencer Pratt in Los Angeles, has a legit beef but he has gone away. The 2020 election definitely was suspicious. The result of Lindell’s election is not voter fraud or anything illegitimate, and frankly it’s sad to see a man spiral like he has.
I will say this on the way out. I do believe there are elections that are not legitimate. Spencer Pratt in LA being the most recent one.

However, when you lose by 11%, lick your wounds, admit defeat, and go home. I’m sorry but one reason I left the GOP in California was an influx of whackos. I can deal with a Tony Andrade (RIP) but when you have Andrew Levy and Jorge Riley, it’s a bridge too far. I’m happy to be gone. They aren’t smart enough to realize this, but they are killing their own party by driving off decent folks. How many doors has Levy or Riley knocked on, or calls made? I’m betting next to zero. As a result, I’m not surprised Leo Naranjo is thrilled about .01% of the vote. Participation trophy and a sticker for the fridge.
The Chief
Luigi Mangioni Cops a Plea
Blogger’s Note: This is a commentary with info not believed by this blog, it’s speculation only.
For those who didn’t follow the news, Mangioni was charged with killing United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

It was an interesting reaction from all corners of the US. There was shock as the killing happening in broad daylight, and folks saying the CEO deserved it. United health customers went online with statements like this: “My ______ was denied treatment by United Health and he got what he deserved” was actually a thing. The latter, while not a majority of the US, was likely a higher percentage of folks than expected.

Mangioni faced both a federal and state trial for murder. His legal team actually got a couple of wins. Federal terrorism charges and the death penalty were off the table. Terrorism charges are a thing due to the Patriot Act, which says essence that killing or threatening to kill someone can get you labeled as a terrorist. Oh, that charge comes with a death penalty eligible sentence.

I honestly thought this was headed for trial, I believe William agrees. The trial would have been held in New York and there are enough bleeding-heart types there that I think you could have had a hung jury. Think about it, the number of conspiracy theorists, whack jobs, and folks who share the belief the CEO got what he deserved there was likely a better than 0% chance he could walk.

I spoke to a friend of the blog from law firm Low, Ballem and Lynch and she had an interesting take on this. She stated Mangioni’s legal team likely got bad news at a hearing about evidence and decided they were cooked. Rumor on the interwebs is there was a manifesto essentially stating he wanted to kill this CEO, and he apparently called the company claiming he was a multi-millionaire and wanted to invest in the company, hence he got the details on the whereabouts of the CEO that day.

(Reminds me of the John Malkovich character in Clint Eastwood’s “In the Line of Firm” movie.)

My lawyer friend said evidence like that essentially means you are cooked and copping a plea is the right move.
She made another interesting point that I never had thought of. His legal team is playing the long game. He will do 20-30 years in federal prison. Federal prison is far nicer than state prison. (He is also charged with murder in New York State Court). New York is home to a couple of brutal state prisons; Rikers Island and Attica. She thinks you cop a plea and argue in state court that their charges constitute double jeopardy. Double jeopardy is a legal term that you can’t be charged by two entities for the same crime. Whether he wins or not will be interesting. If the state charge is thrown out, he will walk out of prison a free man one day.
I understand the reason to cop a plea, but it would have been interesting to go to trial. One item most overlooked in criminal trials is the jury needs to be unanimous to convict, one hold out hangs the jury. Civil court only requires a majority. Just takes one.
Editor’s Note: the t-shirts used as graphics in this post are actual shirts for sale on the Internet and not AI generated by Really Right staff.
Review: What is the Gospel?
The church that I am attending began a book of the month club this summer. This month’s installment is What is the Gospel? By Greg Gilbert.
The book is only 8 chapters. Much of it is very good and I have no complaints but chapters 6 & 7—which are built on each other—are simply cringe worthy. Chapter 7 is what my math teacher used to call, “error carried forward.” Since chapter 6 is wrong then the premise used to introduce chapter 7 is wrongly stated.
Chapter 1 establishes the Bible as God’s authority
Chapter 2 is God the Creator
Chapter 3 is man’s rebellion
Chapter 4 is Jesus as our substitute
Chapter 5 is our response to God’s offer of salvation
Chapter 6 is about God’s Kingdom.
Chapter 7 is focusing on the gospel
Chapter 8 is entitled “The Power of the Gospel”
Chapter 6 starts out with a lot of promise, but it ends up like a line drive hit that curves foul just as you are rising to your feet to cheer the home run.
The author established that the Kingdom of God is a now thing, not just a future reality. This is a direct rebuttal of the Premillennial Dispensationalist position that claims the Kingdom of God is a future thing because the Jewish leaders in Jesus’ day rejected the offer, so God had to go to Plan B, the Church. This view is unbiblical but widely held by many, including a number of folks in my congregation. The idea that man’s free will can thwart God’s plan is heresy. (More proof Scofieldism is the cultural sin of the modern American evangelical church.)
However, instead of saying that Jesus should be Lord of every area of our lives because God is Savior of the whole man, reversing the curse of creation, he pivots to “me and God are a majority”. The Kingdom of God is reduced from its rightful place to a claim that the Gospel is only concerned with saving your soul. He pivots to some sort of pietism, Gnostic form of salvation, or some strange version of amillennialism.
In the Book of Daniel, the Kingdom is described as a rock that smashes the world empires and grows into a mountain that fills the whole earth. In another chapter Gilbert even quotes the verse about the knowledge of the Lord covering the earth as the waters cover the sea but in the final analysis, he balks at the truth of the Scripture and goes in a wrong direction.
I must attribute this error to the fact that he nowhere mentions that God rules in terms of covenantal institutions. Scripture has at least four governments established by God that he rules through, self-government, family, church, and the state.
Thus, in chapter 7, Gilbert mocks the idea that the Gospel not only transforms individuals but also cultures. Biblical transformation is bottom-up while evangelicals try top-down political change—which is not the same thing.
To quote a book that I read last week, “the Kingdom of God is Christian civilization.” Jesus commands us in the Great Commission to disciple the nations not just individuals. God demands that every area of our life be subject to his Lordship. This includes your family, your job, your spare time, your church, your city, county, province, state, nation. Plus, education, arts, music, media, entertainment, everything.
Jesus is Lord of all. The Gospel is an all or nothing proposition. No part of your life can be held back from Him. The “fair exchange” is only valid if we die to ourselves in everything, only then can he give us his life.
We don’t just add Jesus to our lives the way some career women add a husband to their lives or buy a new pair of shoes. Jesus isn’t here to make your life complete. Such a view is a lie. Jesus is here to make dead people live. That thinking is very foreign to most Americans, even those sitting next to us in church.
Greg Gilbert checks the boxes for what God did for us in salvation, but he totally muffs it in regard to what salvation is all about. The comprehension of what salvation does to individuals, churches, and communities is dismissed as irrelevant in his book. This reduction of Christianity makes salvation some Gnostic, pietistic, or otherworldly thing that doesn’t transform every part of a Christian’s life.
The old saying to “give your heart to Jesus but your ass belongs to the United States Army” is a lie. Jesus claims lordship over the Army too. And not just ours, but every army in every country belongs to him.
Jesus is ruling from heaven, but he rules all the affairs of men and has for a very long time. Gilbert misses this aspect of the Kingdom and reduces it to some ethereal, spiritual thing with no reality in this present world.
Gilbert’s book will get you to the Cross of Christ but not beyond that point; for that you must look elsewhere.
Bobby Dog Update
I paid money to see a local attorney about the pit bull killing my dog. They took a pass on any intervention. Ditto with the local police. The pit bull must either attack a human or kill two more animals—along with people filing police reports—or nothing will happen. I was advised to work things out with the owner of the pit bull or take my chances in small claims court.
Even though the pit bull should be put down, nobody will compel the owner to do so. I was told that if the other dog owner pays the vet bill that I’m getting a deal; after all, we’re still neighbors when this all blows over. At best, the lawyer said, maybe they will give me enough money to get another dog.
Folks, I don’t want another dog. I made up my mind about that years ago. However, I thought my puppy friend would grow old and die of natural causes, not unnatural ones.
This trail, mess, or whatever it’s called, is not going how I imagined that it would. I would like restitution and to know that I did something to prevent this from happening again. Neither look likely without going to court. Whether that battle is worth fighting is unknown. Sadly, my only option at present is to wait and see if the pit bull owner makes me an offer.
Update
Sadly, what I wanted and what I got through this ordeal was very different. Shortly after this blog was posted, the owner of the pit bull, Scott, did give me a check for the vet bill for Bobby’s injuries but he offered zero compensation for my actual loss.
While nothing can replace Bobby, during his lifetime we invested several thousand dollars on keeping Bobby cared for, safe, and loved. Again, he was the last part of my marriage with Sheryl that I had left. He was representative of our happy times together wrapped up in fur and four legs. The last part of Sheryl that I had is gone.
My house is cold and empty without him. Every morning I look out the window and see the grave where he was laid to rest. Bobby, thanks for being my puppy friend. I really hope you are with mommy now.
I can’t begin to tell you how much I miss a small boy singing about corgi dogs ten years ago. I miss them both so much, it hurts.
Attorney Mario Update August 2026
In his book, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli famously said that justice cannot be had without money.

The same can be said about Attorney Mario and the legal system that he navigates. Pesos (expended by me) yields progress.
The annulment process for my girlfriend has finally taken a leap forward as measured by every metric that I can find on the subject. Her ex-husband lives outside the country and to check the attempted notification box once and for all, we had to pay for publication of a public notice in a Philippine-based newspaper with an international circulation. This is a statutory requirement under their law. Yes, the law requires an old-school, dead tree variety, newspaper notice. The text and the pricing were provided by the courts.
Contrary to some claims, I’m not made of money. Said money tree in Elk Grove died about 20 years ago. Oh, to be fair, it was really called “the money tree” because it was the smallest tree in the yard (an apricot or peach tree if you need to ask) and our debt at the time was like the largest tree on the property (a lemon tree).
The text that the court wanted published for the public notice was about a 25-page MS Word document saved as a PDF file. The court wanted the notice published twice, once a week, for two weeks. The court provided one bid for the Philippine Star to publish this wonderful document. $2,550. Yep. That’s United States dollars not pesos. I about wet my boxers. I responded “Heck no! That’s way too much.” I asked for other options.
The court then provided two more choices, both for much less money. The next one was about $1,800 and the third was about $1,125. Reluctantly, I paid the money for choice number 3. Western Union put a 4 day hold on the transaction, but it finally went through. Mario was given the money and then for two and a half weeks, nothing but crickets. Early today, Mario responded that the public notice would be run on August 17 and 24th.
I found a thumbnail of the pages of the August 17th newspaper online. The public notice took up one entire page. Yep, we paid for two full page ads to blast out the legalese required by the court.

Once the notice runs the second time, the newspaper provides the court with copies of both ads and an affidavit attesting under penalty of perjury that they ran the ads as instructed.
Then the court has two internal boxes to check and then we finally get a court date.
Per the search engine of my choice, the projected timeline for the rest of this legal process is about 8 weeks or roughly the end of October. It is alleged by Attorney Mario that the judge is a stickler and if everything is in order, that the court process will be brief and swift. That would be a refreshing change of pace, if true.
Lastly, I have an agreement to be reimbursed for the annulment process after it is concluded. Gladly, there is little else that requires payment. The witness fees are part of the court process, but I hope at least a few of the scheduled witnesses can be skipped since this is an undisputed proceeding.
Once the annulment process is concluded, then the U.S. immigration process can begin. Option A is about ten months, and Option B is about 16 months. There are pluses and minuses for each. Of course, the choice with the shorter timeline is about $1,000 more and lots more paperwork.
The fourth quarter of 2026 looks to be very interesting.
Why did you run for office?
Title is self-explanatory. Seventy-some-odd people ran for governor, about eight were actually qualified. When I say qualified, I don’t mean that they are a resident, meet age requirements etc. Here is what I mean.
- Ability to raise significant money or self-fund. It takes 40-50 million to run for governor in this state, that’s just to be viable. If you can’t raise that, why would you run? It’s pointless and maybe it’s just to feed your ego.
- Have an actual platform. Sorry but lower taxes and less spending is not a platform, those are just basic talking points that have been around forever. Show me actual ideas.
- Drop the niche ideas no one cares about. A candidate I assisted years ago was all-in on a part-time legislature. That idea, while novel, appeals to CRA and central committee types only. The number of people who do not care about or understand what that means is quite a large swath of the electorate.
- Know the issues of the seat you are running for. Another candidate I helped spoke about how the school district was loaded with debt and we’re doing “another” school bond. The first door we knocked on, a retired administrator said the debt is very manageable, and we have not done a school bond before. Yikes! Credibility shot just like that.
- You could be serving as a vote siphon. Think of it this way, perhaps you are taking votes away from a more viable candidate. Look no further than the Michigan Senate primary this past week. An Isreal hating whacko came in first, look him up. He is a nut. The more sensible candidate lost by around 14,000 votes, less than 1%. A sensible third candidate who dropped out too late got around 65,000 votes. Figure most of those go to the sensible second place finisher and viola, the viable candidate moves on.
Bottom line: run for an office you think you can win. As mentioned earlier, a gubernatorial campaign will cost you 40-50 million dollars; that may be on the lower end. Senate? Ditto. Congress; probably 4-5 million depending on where you run. Assembly or State Senate; about a couple million, likely. Hard to get your message out when you have no money. A race like city council, school board, or water board may be more your speed. Start at a lower race, you may even get lucky and face no opponent. Heck water board you could win just by knocking on doors in your neighborhood.
Running for governor and congratulating yourself for getting .01% of the vote is just juvenile. Congratulations, you are the tallest midget, and your actions could have caused trouble. What if Steve Hilton missed the run off by 5,000 votes? Crazier things have happened. Saying you exceeded expectations is laughable in its own right. If your expectation was to get more than a statistical 0% of the vote what a sad, pathetic life you have.
Pit Bull Kills My Best Friend
Yep. It was Wednesday, August 5th. I got home about 7 PM, grabbed the mailbox key, hooked the leash to my friend, and proceeded to walk to the mailbox. I’ve done this evolution virtually every day for three and a half years.

Last night there was nothing in the mailbox, so we headed home. We passed two children with sticks. OK, they were more like small branches, that they were hitting on the asphalt. Bobby, my friend, didn’t like the noise so he avoided the children. Then we passed two ladies talking in the middle of the street. As was my habit, I was video chatting with my girlfriend during the walk.

My girl had just handed the phone to her three-year-old niece when I saw him. A pit bull passed me on the left side, almost brushing against my leg, and grabbed my dog by the head and neck. He then shifted to biting my dog’s right rear leg. The pit bull lifted my dog, all 16 pounds, right off the ground. I screamed “Let go” and tried to grab the pit bull on the side of the mouth. No way was I putting my hand inside his mouth; not that there was room.

Someone tried to get the dog to release mine, but it would not. After about four tries, the pit bull released my dog’s leg. As the pit bull let go of my dog I heard someone say, “this is the third time he’s done that.”
I knew the instant that I saw the injury and heard his cries of pain that he wouldn’t make it… but you hope anyway.

I needed to get him to a doctor. I carefully picked the dog up, being sure not to put any pressure on his mangled leg. I made the comment that “I am probably going to have to put him down.”
The dog’s owner said, “I probably will have to do that too.”
I noticed that there was blood across Bobby’s stomach from the teeth puncturing his belly. We started walking home. A man that I never turned to look at, offered me a ride home. I declined and kept walking.
As we had left the house earlier, I noticed that my neighbors were in the yard. As we started to pass their property on the way home, I called out as loud as I could “Will.” No response. I went a bit further and called again. No response. As I rounded the corner and headed for the driveway I called again. “Will! I need help.” At that point, he came out of his house. As I got closer to him, I said, “Bobby just got attacked by a pit bull. I need help.”
Will and his wife came out to help. His wife got a towel and they had me sit in the passenger seat of their car. The towel was placed in my lap, and then I lowered Bobby gently onto my lap. I was careful not to put any pressure on his leg. Will got his cell phone and I got mine. We tried desperately to find a veterinarian to help—remember all these places are closed after 5 PM. Both local vets were out of town and too far away to help.

As this was going on, Will said that there was a green pickup at my house. I told him that it must be the owner of the other dog. Will spoke with him briefly but I don’t know what was said. Will came back to his house, and we continued dialing for help.
After about 20 minutes of futility, Will found a 24-hour emergency pet clinic. The bad news was that it was an hour and a half driver away. With no other alternatives, we headed to the clinic in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

As he got in the car, Will tried to pet Bobby on the head. Bobby yelped. This was where he was first bitten and it hurt him. There was saliva from the other dog on various parts of his head and neck. As we began our journey, I removed his walking harness. Yes, my dog was on a leash and within two or three feet of me when attacked. We were on the opposite side of the street from where the other dog lived.

I found a place to scratch him just behind his front leg. Will had made a comment that Bobby was in shock, and I think he was right. About halfway to our destination, Bobby began panting and his respiration changed. It was subtle but noticeable. After a while his panting stopped. Every once in a while, I had to adjust Bobby because of speed changes and some turns cause his weight to shift slightly. The entire trip he never made a sound; not even a whimper.

And yes, Bobby was always this quiet. Never once in the ten years that we had him as a pet, did he ever bark at another animal that barked at him first. Only once did he ever respond in a defensive manner to any human. The guy that triggered his ire was a smelly, drug addicted, homeless man that jumped out of the bushes and headed towards my wife and I one day back in Elk Grove. Bobby didn’t like that guy, and we felt that his response was justified. Other than the homeless guy, Bobby only wanted to make friends and get tummy scratches. He knew no fear or to be afraid.
Will finally got us to the vet hospital. It was near the Toyota dealer where I had traded Sheryl’s Jeep last year after nobody could fix the vehicle’s death rattle. He let me off at the front door and then went to get a parking place.
I couldn’t open the door enough to get inside. A lady came from behind the counter and opened the door for me. My first surprise was how busy this place was. The majority of seats in the waiting area were filled with other people and their pets. I told the lady that my dog was attacked by a pit bull.

A man came out of the back room to get Bobby. He wasn’t paying attention to Bobby’s injury, and I refused to hand the dog to him. I explained, no, you can’t hold him like that because his leg was injured. It took two tries but finally the guy was willing to hold Bobby in such a way that he didn’t touch the injured leg. I was told they would check his vitals and report back. A short time later I heard him yelp.
Then a long period of time lapsed. Finally, I was asked if I would allow them to give Bobby some pain meds and I agreed. A short time later, they also mentioned x-rays and wanted authorization. I was thinking to myself, it’s about time.
I knew when the x-rays were happening. The sickening and very long yelps from Bobby were unmistakable cries of pain and anguish. Three times he cried out. I was heartbroken. Remember, this was after they gave him pain medicine.
I had kept Will with me most of my time there. I wanted him around for support and also as a witness. He had let me know that this was not his first rodeo when it came to the dogs in his care. He had just had to deal with euthanizing one of his dogs about six weeks ago.

Another long period elapsed. Finally, the verdict was in. The doctor met Will and I in an examination room. He explained Bobby’s situation like this: his leg was not broken, but the hip joint in the pelvic region was a mess. Unlike humans with a ball and socket joint, the dog’s leg is attached by connective tissues, ligaments, muscles, etc. This joint was destroyed. If he set the leg, it would not be enough. It would be easy to come out again. Bobby would need surgery right away with no guarantee of success. If he had the surgery, he would have limited use of the leg and be in pain for the rest of his days. Walking, going up steps, getting into and out of my bed, which were things that happened many times each day, would all be painful and hazardous for him. In short, Bobby would never be the same again.
Oh, the leg setting would be about $2,000 and the surgery would be as much as $6,000. I imagine that there would be other costs as well, but they weren’t discussed. Folks, injuries like this are a financial rabbit hole that most mortals just can’t afford to go down.
In addition, they never checked Bobby for other injuries, but I suspect they could have found them had they checked.
A few months ago, some people in my church discussed this very subject. They ran up a bill for their pet in excess of $11,000 and the pet died despite the extraordinary treatment. Imagine you did all that for your pet, it dies, and you still get to pay the medical bills. Is that the reminder of your Fluffy that you want? I doubt it.
So, I knew what was coming but not the particulars. That was the thing I noticed about my wife’s death as well. You knew the final outcome but the path to get there was unexpected. Life is not the simple, linear progression that you see in movies and popular novels.
After explaining that Bobby’s quality of life would be crap and that I couldn’t really afford to help him, the decision was obvious. But it was mine to make.

My wife made her own decision to end it all when she quit using oxygen and stopped eating. Either would kill her, but both made it a matter of days until her end. At that point it was just a matter of running out the clock. However, this decision about Bobby was on me.
I spoke with Will and then I asked how it would be done. I was told there were two injections and it was quick. I then asked to be with Bobby when it happened. They asked if I needed time with him? I responded just a minute.
Bobby was given an IV setup and then brought into the examination room. The lady had two syringes with her. I petted him on the neck and nose. I told him that I love him. I thanked him for being my friend. I told him that I would miss him. I prayed that God would somehow let Bobby be with Sheryl. He was a blessing to both of us. I noticed that his eyes were very dilated. I was told it was from the previously administered pain killers.

After a quick goodbye, I told the lady that she could give him the injection. Within ten seconds or so, his head went slowly to the table. He went limp. 20 seconds after the injection, Bobby was dead.
She checked him with a stethoscope and confirmed that he was gone. She wrapped Bobby in a clean blanket and brought him to us at the rear entrance to the clinic. It’s not good public relations to see dead animals leaving out the front door of your veterinary clinic, so we couldn’t be seen going that way to get in the car.
I could have had him cremated but I don’t believe in that for people so why do it to my puppy friend? No, I don’t confuse animals with people, but I wanted to honor him for the joy that he brought both of us and especially me after Sheryl died.
Will took Bobby from the lady and carried him to the hatch of his car. Bobby was placed on a soft blanket or something like that. The hatch was closed and we made the hour and one-half trek back to Bonners Ferry. The time was about 11:30 PM.

We arrived just after 1 AM. Will had indicated that he wanted to bury Bobby right then. He said don’t worry, the ground is easy to shovel. As he made the hole, I couldn’t help but think of all the old horror movies where one guy did the digging and the other holding a lantern, watched the fog for movement.
Once the hole was dug, I opened the blanket to get Bobby’s collar. It was easy to tell which end was his head. The body was still warm when I touched it. I closed the blanket back up and then lowered him in the hole about 5 feet from the only tree in my yard. It is an old gnarly apple tree. I silently said a few words over him including thanking God for the gift he had given us in this little dog. I took the shovel and covered the body of my friend. Will tidied up the grave and went home to bed.
I went inside and took a shower. I smelled musky like the excretions of Bobby’s anal glands. At 2 AM I got into bed. I woke up at 5 AM. I was up for the day.
I could go on, but this is probably a good stopping point for documenting Bobby’s death.
Epilogue
I cried that night and often since because Bobby was the last part of my wife that I had left in my life.

My best friend, my puppy friend, was gone. The last part of my wife was ended. Sheryl is truly and completely gone now. My house is truly empty for the very first time ever. Bobby was the embodiment of all my happy memories with my wife Sheryl stuffed into a loving, furry body with four very short legs. Bobby was my reminder of the happy times in my marriage and also of my son when he was living at home; before he made stupid life choices. Bobby was my companion for the better part of ten years. He went almost everywhere with me except overseas. As the guy behind the camera, there are few, if any, photos of us together.
The vet told me to file a police report about the attack. Being this is rural Idaho; I have no idea if anything results from my complaint but there is a case number logged as a result of the attack. My dad suggested that I contact a lawyer and see if they can get me some compensation for the other guy’s homeowner’s insurance. I don’t know what that is supposed to be, but I did it. I made an appointment yesterday. When you are experiencing the trauma like this and have had only three hours of sleep, you follow what makes sense at the time.
Oh, Will paid the vet bill for me, and I must pay him back. Attorney Mario already picked my pocket this month, so I didn’t have the funds to pay the vet.

I think I told my tale accurately. I’m still suffering from a lack of sleep and the trauma of a most unexpected curveball thrown into my life.
Bobby’s beds, carrier, and toys have been washed. I will be donating most of his stuff somewhere or another in the next couple of days.
I really miss my bed buddy. It is really weird to get the whole mattress to myself. His reputation for hogging the blankets is legendary. He earned the name “chastity dog” because he kept my wife and I on opposite sides of the bed for many years.
Bobby was part of our family from his adoption at the rescue shelter on December 31, 2016, until his murder on August 5, 2026. I love you, my little friend. Well done. Thank you for being part of my life, and that of my family.

Ex-Mormon and I Takedown Bible Study Leader
Yep. The highlight of my day was going to the church’s men’s Bible study last night. One guy that regularly attends is a former member of the LDS Church. He made a comment concerning Jesus binding the strong man and stealing his goods. (We’ll get to the text in a moment.)
The Bible study leader was dumbfounded. He couldn’t get past the wooden literalism that Premillennial Dispensationalists have when reading the Bible. Pre-Mil people don’t have the discernment to know when the Bible is using figures of speech, metaphors, and so forth or is intended to be read as written. Literally means in accordance with the literature but such a concept is outside of their biblical understanding.
The leader was tripped up on the idea that Jesus could possibly steal anything. Why? Because Jesus was honest, and God and a good teacher. Also, binding is a violent act, another obstacle to understanding the text. Biblical Jesus is not the weakling, milquetoast guy that modern people envision him to be. Of course, the context didn’t help. He just got more confused.
Later, I told him that Jesus binding the strong man—the Devil—and stealing his stuff—us—was the unanimous understanding of the passage by the Reformers, but those guys have no credibility with him. Nope, he is nondenominational and proud to have never been a member of any church. He thinks he knows the Bible but like all such people in nondenominational churches, he knows the milk of the Word backwards and forwards but seems to miss that we are commanded to get into the meat of the Word.
Sorry, but the meat of the Word gets messy and difficult; challenging our most deeply held ideas about God and our relationship to him.
We—the ex-Mormon and I—left him last night totally stuck after being confronted with the Truth but unable to comprehend it.
I will now quote the passage and then toss it to Logos software to give you their take. I’m doing this sight unseen (I don’t know what Logos will say but I’m confident I’m right.)
Yep, now you can test both the Scripture and AI in the same exercise. Sounds like fun to me. Here we go.
The Text
25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand: 26 And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand? 27 And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? therefore they shall be your judges. 28 But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you. 29 Or else how can one enter into a strong man’s house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house
Matthew 12:25–29.
Logos AI analysis
Jesus uses the image of binding a strongman to respond to accusations that he casts out demons through Satan’s power—the strongman represents Satan himself[1]. The parable poses a logical challenge: how can anyone plunder a strong man’s possessions without first restraining him (Matt 12:25–29)? The strongman’s house symbolizes the world under Satan’s control, his possessions are the spirits and people enslaved to him, and Jesus’ exorcisms constitute an assault on that domain[2].
Rather than being in league with Satan as the scribes claimed, Jesus came to Satan’s “house” to bind him and liberate the souls held captive there[1]. Satan’s kingdom collapses not through internal division but through the invasion of God’s kingdom in Jesus’ ministry[2]. The binding itself remains theologically complex—while the text doesn’t explicitly clarify the timing, it’s fundamentally connected to Jesus’ death, resurrection, and eventual return as judge[2]. In the immediate context of his earthly ministry, the binding may relate to his baptism and wilderness temptation, or more broadly to the kingdom’s inauguration through his work[2].
The metaphor invites reflection on God’s role as liberator—mirroring the exodus when God bound Pharaoh and freed Israel, Jesus’ ministry inaugurates a new exodus, liberating God’s people[2]. Some modern charismatic movements apply this parable to believers’ spiritual warfare, teaching that Christians must bind strongmen in their cities, though Jesus never instructs his followers to do this[1].
**Biblical passages related to this theme:** The Son of God was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8), and through death Christ destroyed him who held the power of death—the devil (Heb 2:14–15). Jesus declares that the judgment of the world has come and the prince of this world will be cast out (John 12:31).
[1] Got Questions Ministries, Got Questions? Bible Questions Answered (Bellingham, WA: Faithlife, 2014–2021).
[2] R. Alan Culpepper, Mark, ed. Leslie Andres and R. Alan Culpepper, Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary (Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing, Incorporated, 2007), 115–116.
Yep, like Doug Wilson said, “Jesus binds Satan and steals his stereo.”
Conclusion
Folks, this illustration is exactly why I attend this church. They need the light of the Gospel. God put me here for this and a few other reasons. If we are to break the false doctrine of popular prophecy thinking, somebody has to disrupt the paradigm. Breaking said paradigm is done by exploiting the cracks in the prevailing presuppositions and demonstrating the inability of their template of providing real answers.
Michael Heiser is right in saying the stuff people skip over are the important parts that are there for a reason. Premillennialism skips the parts that don’t fit their system or recast them into something foreign to the text. Forcing them to account for the things they can’t forces them to either adjust their worldview or deny God’s Word.
I hate that modern folks compartmentalize everything because then they can’t see the relationships between things or the way that Idea A and Idea B are contradictory and can’t simultaneously be true. By holding both in isolation, they attempt to affirm both, which is a logical contradiction.
The frustrating thing at this Bible Study is the claim that they are right about everything because the Holy Spirit showed it to them. That’s laughable. The Spirit can only use what you have studied. If you block stuff because it is difficult or potentially doesn’t agree with you then you aren’t grappling with the text. We are told to be ready and always have an answer for the hope that is within us.
Lastly, the pastor has renounced Premillennial Dispensationalism from the pulpit but the folks in the pews haven’t got the message yet. They have ears but don’t hear and eyes that can’t see but they claim to be more enlightened than Christians in previous generations. Such a claim is laughable but was made earlier last night with much affirmation. Sad.
Idaho Proposition 1 – 2026
Idaho’s Proposition 1 is a literal gut and amend of all abortion related laws in the state. Idaho voters are being asked to dump their very prolife laws and replace them with the same abortion laws as California implemented under Governor Gavin Newsom.
Folks, I am honestly afraid this damnable piece of evilness may pass. Let me explain.
In Idaho, there is a motto amongst liberals that “May Matters.” This is because Idaho is a one-party State, in this case Republican. The dirty secret is that the Idaho Republican Party is heavily infiltrated with Democrats posing as Republicans. Both Parties compete under the Republican banner. Whoever wins the Republican Party nomination in the May Primary is a shoo-in for election in the November General Election. Plus, this being a non-presidential election in November, the upcoming election is expected to see a very low voter turnout.
For those readers in California, think about the way they try to sneak-in the unpopular school bonds via a low turn-out election.
Folks, the only place I have seen anything about Proposition 1 is on Facebook. In Idaho, there are no voter materials mailed to voters by the Secretary of State or local election officials. No voter information, no sample ballots, no list of candidates. Zero Info is generated and/or distributed by government concerning upcoming elections.
All you get in your mailbox is slate mailers from special interest groups, many of whom claim to be affiliated with the Republican Party but are not.
Thus, most folks are in the dark about Prop 1 unless they are very interested in the abortion issue and are active on Facebook.
I think you are beginning to see why I might be concerned.
Here is what happened yesterday. I mentioned the upcoming vote on Prop 1 to two different couples at my church. Both these families are regular attendees at the church and neither had even heard of Prop 1. This spurred me to mention that fact to the pastor. He had never heard of Prop 1 either. To his credit, he did make on an on-the-fly mention of voting “No” from the pulpit.
This problem, dear readers is the crux of the issue, there is no centralized way to communicate information to people these days. We all get our news (or choose not to know) in different ways. Long gone are the days of Huntly, Brinkley, or Uncle Walter Cronkite telling you, “That’s the way it is.”
This is why I’m worried about the defeat of Prop 1. It is currently sneaking under the radar as it was designed to do. Certain echo chambers are sounding the alarm, but their reach is limited to those wanting to know and not communicating to the unwashed masses.
Folks, I will be out of town on election day, so I have registered for an absentee ballot. BTW said ballots are scheduled to be mailed September 18th. I will definitely be voting “No” on this measure, but it is clear that I need to make a lot more noise about this locally.
Prop 1 makes abortion legal for all 9 months of pregnancy, outlaws parental notification, and allows anyone to perform then not just doctors. like I said, just like California